top of page

Virtual school days teach no one.

The best education happens face-to-face... in the classroom.

Oklahoma’s public schools rank near the bottom in total number of instructional days/hours in class, at 165-days as prescribed by State law (current state law allows some districts to be exempted from even the 165-day requirement as long as the 1,080 hours requirement is met).

 

Across the United States, 180-days of in-class instruction is average. Kansas mandates the highest number of in-person classroom days at 186. And many foreign countries require as many as 220 days.

bar chart.png

Oklahoma kids are in class

30 days less

than the national average

Yet another reason why Oklahoma ranks 49th or 50th in public education nationwide.

So where does Oklahoma rank?

While 165-days is the State law, many school districts simply don’t abide by it – and it’s the kids who ultimately pay the price. Bottom line: Our kids aren’t getting enough class time. Some Oklahoma school districts are currently in-classroom less than 150-days a year. That’s 30+ fewer days of in-classroom, in-person instruction – more than six weeks – less than most states.

 

Additionally, because virtual learning days can "count" toward those total requirements (like teacher professional development days), in many instances, students are actually in the classroom far less than the required number of days or even the required number of hours. 

 

More than 100 school districts in Oklahoma currently schedule as many as 10-days of virtual learning while more than 60 districts have scheduled three weeks or more. There is an obvious lack of quality instruction on virtual learning days – as little as 30-minutes of lessons in the day, which is ineffective and inefficient. It’s like a vacation day to most students.

Attention Class Video

National Research Proves That Virtual Days Are Not Quality Education Days.

logo-fallback.webp

The Pew Center article discusses the variation in the length of the school year and school day across the United States. While a 180-day school year is most common, mandated by 27 out of 38 states and the District of Columbia, there is considerable state-by-state variation. Some states set minimums below 180 days, like Colorado with 160, while others exceed it, such as Kansas with 186 days for most grades. In addition to the number of school days, many states regulate school time by mandating a certain number of hours or minutes per school year, with averages varying by grade level. Some states also specify a minimum number of hours or minutes per school day, which can also vary by grade level. The article also notes that states differ on how and whether to count non-classroom time, such as lunch and recess, towards these minimums.


See the entire article here: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/09/07/in-the-u-s-180-days-of-school-is-most-common-but-length-of-school-day-varies-by-state/

In the U.S., 180 days of school is most common, but length of school day varies by state.

Pew Research Center Article

Harvard University Study

Pandemic schooling mode and student test scores: evidence from us states

A May, 2022 study from the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University, called ‘Consequences of Remote/Hybrid Instruction During the Pandemic’(1), found that “remote instruction was a primary driver of widening achievement gaps” during the pandemic.

 

Also, a 2021 working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found “that pass rates declined compared to prior years and that these declines were larger in districts with less in-person instruction.”

 

The Harvard study also examined the impact of remote and hybrid instruction on student achievement.

 

Using data from 2.1 million students in 10,000 schools across 49 states and D.C., the research found that remote instruction significantly widened achievement gaps, particularly in math, for students in high-poverty schools. High-poverty districts that went virtual/remote in 2020-21 will need to spend nearly all their federal aid on academic recovery.

Harvard’s Key Findings:

 

  1. Achievement Gaps: Remote instruction was a major factor in widening achievement gaps by race and school poverty.

    High-poverty schools experienced greater losses in math and reading compared to low-poverty schools.​
     

  2. Impact of Instructional Mode: Schools that remained in-person did not see a widening of math achievement gaps, though some reading gaps widened.
     

  3. Federal Aid: High-poverty districts that went remote will need to use almost all their federal aid to address learning losses.

  4. Differential Impacts: The negative impact of remote instruction was more severe in high-poverty schools, contributing significantly to the widening achievement gaps.

 

The shift to remote and hybrid instruction during the pandemic had significant negative effects on student achievement, especially in high-poverty schools.

 

See the entire article here: https://cepr.harvard.edu/files/cepr/files/5-4.pdf?m=1651690491

harvard-logo-1-2.png

Education Week Article

Which States Require the Most—and Least—Instructional Time? Find Out.

The Education Week article discusses the variations in instructional time requirements across different states in the U.S. The difference between the shortest and longest academic year can be as much as 150 hours, potentially leading to a one-and-a-half-year difference in instructional time over a K-12 academic career. The average American student spends 1,231 hours in school annually, but the decision on the number of days or hours is left to state lawmakers and school boards, resulting in significant variations. The article also mentions that research supports the idea that more time in class can be beneficial if used intentionally, especially when combined with other improvement efforts like tutoring and increased school spending. The article includes a breakdown of each state's minimum instructional time requirements, based on data from the Education Commission of the States.

See the entire article here: https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/which-states-require-the-most-and-least-instructional-time-find-out/2024/12

mln-edweek.jpg

Virtual school days

Local Articles and references

Oklahoma Senate leader seeks limit on virtual school days

OCPA Article by Ray Carter | December 19, 2024

The new leader of the Oklahoma Senate says he plans to renew the effort to restrict virtual and distance-learning days in Oklahoma public schools, saying routine use of virtual days outside of actual emergency situations has been “disastrous” for children’s learning.

 

Despite the negative impact on learning, Senate President Pro Tempore-Elect Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, noted that school districts across the state have unveiled proposed calendars for the 2025-2026 school year that include pre-scheduled virtual days.

 

“Children learn best when they are in the classroom,” Paxton said. “They also learn critical social skills and how to interact with their

peers. Virtual learning also puts a strain on working parents, who must find childcare or take off from work.”

 

Paxton and state Sen. Kristen Thompson, R-Edmond, plan to refile legislation to reduce the use of virtual school days in public education.

 

Senate Bill 1768, as filed in the 2024 session, allowed virtual classroom instruction only in the event of inclement weather, staff shortages, illness, building maintenance issues, or if deemed necessary by school administrators and approved by the State Department of Education.

 

“This is necessary legislation to ensure students are getting the best education possible, which is in-person and in the classroom,” Thompson said. “I have seen firsthand the lack of quality instruction that occurs on a remote learning day. We have a responsibility to our children that they get the best education possible. I look forward to filing this measure again.”

 

Paxton noted that Oklahoma schools have been provided with record funding in recent years that negates any need to do distance learning as a cost-cutting measure.

 

Out of more than 500 public school districts in Oklahoma, more than 100 districts reported having at least one site where students had two work weeks (10 days) or more virtual days throughout the 2022-2023 school year with sites at more than 60 districts imposing distance learning for three or more work weeks. 

 

The Oklahoma Rural Schools Coalition argued the number of virtual days reported by districts to the Oklahoma State Department of Education for the 2022-2023 school year was not accurate. But many of those districts listed numerous pre-planned virtual days on their public school-year calendars.

 

In addition, many districts that have four-day school weeks have also combined a shortened week with pre-scheduled virtual days.

 

Nationally, the average K–12 school is in session for 179 days a year without about seven hours spent in school each day. But in Oklahoma, schools can provide just 165 days of instruction, so long as 1,080 hours of total learning occur over the course of the year.

 

And state law allows some districts to be exempted from even the 165-day requirement.

 

In 2024, the Jennings district was allowed to provide just 156 days of instruction while the Glencoe district provided 158 days. And those totals included numerous distance-learning days, according to the schools’ public calendars. Jennings had eight “distance learning days” built into the school calendar while Glencoe had five pre-scheduled “virtual days.”

 

More districts are now considering a shift to four-day weeks, such as Broken Arrow, one of the state’s largest districts. The Broken Arrow plan includes pre-scheduled distance-learning days.

 

When distance learning became the norm in many schools nationwide during the Covid pandemic, it was associated with substantial learning loss.

 

A May 2022 report from the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University found that “remote instruction was a primary driver of widening achievement gaps” during the pandemic, while a 2021 working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found “that pass rates declined compared to prior years and that these declines were larger in districts with less in-person instruction.”

 

Paxton noted that Oklahoma schools have been provided with record funding in recent years that negates any need to do distance learning as a cost-cutting measure. State appropriations to public schools have increased by more than $1 billion since 2018, and other funding sources have also increased.

 

“In the past several years, we have appropriated historic levels of funding to schools across the state,” Paxton said. “I believe returning to in-person work and cutting down on virtual days will improve productivity across state agencies, including public education.”

Already Short School Year Includes Virtual Days At Some Oklahoma Schools

OCPA Article by Ray Carter | January 25, 2024

In most states, public schools provide around 180 days of instruction per year, according to data compiled by the Pew Research Center.

But in Oklahoma, schools can provide just 165 days of instruction, so long as 1,080 hours of total learning occur over the course of the year. That’s three work weeks less instruction than what occurs in most states.

 

But in some districts, the gap between Oklahoma and other states is even wider.

 

State law allows some districts to be exempted from the 165-day requirement, based on academic outcomes, meaning some districts provide even fewer days of instruction.

 

At this month’s meeting of the State Board of Education, three schools received approval to operate for fewer than 165 days: Antlers (150 days), Jennings (156 days), and Glencoe (158 days).

 

School calendars show that two of those three schools routinely incorporate pre-scheduled online virtual days rather than in-person instruction into their schedule. Jennings has eight “distance learning days” built into this year’s school calendar while Glencoe has five pre-scheduled “virtual days” this year.

 

That means students at Jennings may receive just 148 days of in-person instruction in a school year while Glencoe students may be provided only 153 days of in-person instruction.

 

That’s substantially less than the 180-day norm in most states—as much as 32 fewer days of potential in-person instruction, or more than six weeks’ worth of in-class time.

 

And the gap is even larger with some states, such as neighboring Kansas, which mandates a 186-day school year.

The issue of pre-scheduled virtual days may be an issue in this year’s legislative session. Two senators have filed a bill to rein in schools’ reliance on virtual days, which can involve very little teacher interaction with students.

 

Under Senate Bill 1768, by state Sens. Kristen Thompson and Lonnie Paxton, public schools could shift to virtual learning only in the event of inclement weather, staff shortages caused by illness, building maintenance issues, or if found necessary by school administrators.

 

When a school district decides to use a virtual day instead of a traditional snow day, the bill would require school districts to provide a minimum of five and a half hours of instruction to K-8 students and six hours to high school students. Additionally, more than half of the online or digital instruction must be synchronous under the provisions of SB 1768, meaning there must be “real-time interaction between a teacher and students as the primary format of instruction.”

 

Arkansas lawmakers have enacted a similar law that limits virtual days by requiring that public schools provide 178 in-person on-site learning days each school year.

 

In a release announcing the filing of SB 1768, Thompson, a mother of three, noted that while “Oklahoma taxpayers are footing the bill for a full day of instruction,” at some school districts a virtual day could involve “only 30 minutes of lessons.

The fact that routine, pre-scheduled virtual days may be combined with Oklahoma’s shortened school year only further highlights the need for reining in the practice, Thompson said in an interview.

 

“Oklahoma has one of the shortest instructional day/hour requirements in the nation,” said Thompson, R-Edmond. “Studies show that more time in the classroom—not less—leads to educational growth in our students. Virtual days should be utilized for emergency purposes only.

 

Research has found that transitioning from in-person instruction to online learning during the COVID pandemic was strongly associated with student learning loss.

 

A May 2022 report from the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University found that “remote instruction was a primary driver of widening achievement gaps” during the pandemic.

 

A 2021 working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found “that pass rates declined compared to prior years and that these declines were larger in districts with less in-person instruction.”

 

Jennings and Glencoe’s reliance on pre-scheduled virtual days was not highlighted by the two schools when they requested permission to operate for less than 165 days.

 

In the schools’ letters requesting permission to operate on an even shorter school year, Glencoe Superintendent Jay Reeves wrote that as a result of the shorter school year “our teacher candidate pool has increased tremendously.” He wrote that Glencoe is “one of the very few districts in the state that did not hire any emergency certified or adjunct teachers, which is almost unheard of, and I credit that almost exclusively to our ability to follow this calendar flexibility.”

Glencoe is a PK-12 district with 340 students. It has operated on a four-day school week for most of a decade now.

Jennings is a PK-8th grade district that currently has 265 students and has operated on a four-day school week for 12 years.

Under state law, exemptions to the already short 165-day school-year requirement may be provided if schools achieve certain academic outcomes.

Antlers, Jennings, and Glencoe met those benchmarks.

In the 2022-2023 school year, the Antlers elementary school received a C on the state schools’ report card, while the district’s middle school and high school each received a B. The Jennings district received a C on its state report card. At Glencoe, the district’s elementary school received a B, and the high school received a C.

Even so, some board members expressed concern about making an already short school year even shorter.

 

“The Legislature put into law 165 days,” said state board member Kendra Wesson. “I can’t get past how less instruction time or less days in school is good for kids.”

During the meeting, Jennings Superintendent Derrick Meador said that while other Oklahoma schools may operate more days each year, those schools are typically not providing more instruction on the additional days.

Meador said Jennings’ current school year began Aug. 2, 2023, and will conclude on May 2, 2024. He said the schedule is designed so all academic standards will be taught before state testing in late April with only about one week after testing for things such as awards assemblies and graduations.

“There’s no downtime, because to prepare for state testing all of your standards have to be taught prior to state testing,” Meador said. “If you look at the schools going to the end of May, and you talk to those administrators, those teachers, they’re telling you there’s a lot of babysitting going on in those last few weeks. We don’t have that.”

Are school virtual days ending? Lawmakers look to add restrictions in refiled bill

Oklahoma Voice article by Nuria Martinez-Keel

An Oklahoma Senate bill that would curtail school districts’ use of virtual instruction days is expected to make a comeback in the 2025 legislative session.

The bill would forbid public schools from scheduling at-home, online learning days except in cases of inclement weather, staff shortages, illnesses, building maintenance issues, or if school administrators deem it necessary and the Oklahoma State Department of Education approves.

Last session’s version, Senate Bill 1768, passed the Senate but failed to get a hearing on the House floor.

One of the bill’s authors, Sen. Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, is now the Senate’s top lawmaker. 

Paxton and co-author Sen. Kristen Thompson, R-Edmond, announced on Thursday their plans to refile the bill for next session, which begins Feb. 3.

“We continue to see the disastrous and inefficient effects virtual learning is having on our children,” Paxton said. “We also continue to see school districts across the state plan their calendars for next year that include even more virtual days. Children learn best when they are in the classroom.”

Some school districts replicate four-day school weeks by scheduling a virtual school day once a week throughout the academic year, totaling 20 or more days of at-home learning. Many districts, though, use them sparingly on days of staff training, parent-teacher conferences or emergency situations.

Virtual school days detract from educational quality and strain working parents, Paxton and Thompson said. 

The legislation would impact only traditional brick-and-mortar schools. Schools that primarily conduct online education, like virtual charter schools, would be unaffected.

Schools that use a virtual instruction day would have to notify the state Education Department within 72 hours, according to the text of the previous bill. The state agency would be responsible for reviewing whether the school did so for a permissible reason, and if the school had not, it would have to schedule an extra day of in-person classes.

“This is necessary legislation to ensure students are getting the best education possible, which is in-person and in the classroom,” Thompson said. “I have seen firsthand the lack of quality instruction that occurs on a remote learning day. We have a responsibility to our children that they get the best education possible. I look forward to filing this measure again.”

What you can do to help improve public education in Oklahoma!

The OKEII supports HB1276, authored by Representative Chad Caldwell (R. Enid), which would require district policies prohibiting student cell phones and smartwatch use under certain circumstances and with exceptions for emergencies. It would also allow for local implementation of the ban.

 

An Act relating to schools; requiring district boards of education to adopt a policy prohibiting student cell phone and smartwatch use under certain circumstances; requiring exceptions for emergencies; allowing board approval to opt out; requiring annual approval of opt out policies; defining terms; providing for codification; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency.

 

OKEII also supports HB1277, also authored by Chad Caldwell (R. Enid), which would direct the State Board of Education to distribute grants to incentivize phone free spaces in schools.

 

An Act relating to schools; directing the State Board of Education to distribute grants to incentivize phone-free spaces; providing application process; prescribing selection of grant recipients; providing for use of grant funds; authorizing certain negotiations and contract; providing for codification; and declaring an emergency.

OKEII also supports SB139 authored by Senator Ally Siefried (R. Claremore). SB139 is an Act relating to schools; requiring school district boards of education to adopt a policy prohibiting use of cell phones while on campus during certain time period; defining term; directing policy to contain disciplinary procedures; allowing policy to include certain exceptions; directing the State Department of Education to establish certain grant program; directing certain amount to be made available in grants, subject to availability of funding; prescribing use of grant funds; directing grant applications to be submitted on certain form; providing for contents of application; directing grants to be awarded on certain basis; allowing the State Board of Education, in certain conjunction, to issue a request for proposals and enter into certain contract; providing for codification; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency.

weird.jpg
What can you do?

Urge your legislators to support SB758
SB758 prohibits a school district or charter school from counting days or portions of days when school is closed and virtual instruction is provided toward the 180-day or 1,080-hour requirement for the school year. The measure provides an exception for instances when the Governor issues a state of emergency or a proclamation for a specific reason relating to the school’s operations, the state superintendent approves the use of virtual instruction based on the school’s ability to provide it, and the governing board of the school district or charter school approves the use of virtual instruction. The measure also requires the State Department of Education by June 30, 2026, and each subsequent June 30 to publish on its website and electronically submit to the Governor and legislative leaders a report with information regarding the use of virtual instruction.
It's up to us to make a difference.
Let your state representatives know you support these key poieces of legislation.

Find your representatives here: https://www.okhouse.gov/representatives

Citations

 

*Cell Phones in the Classroom: Should it be allowed?

Graduate Programs for Educators

Dr. Benjamin Washington

Project Director for 21st Century Community Learning Centers; Ed.D. Educational Leadership

 

** Oklahoma Education Journal

Hamlin, D. (2024). Results from the 2024 Oklahoma Education Poll. Oklahoma Education Journal, 2(3), 32–40. A representative sample of Oklahoma citizens were polled, as well as all K-12 public school educators and school districts superintendents statewide. The surveys yielded statistically significant data from all groups and producing a margin-of-error of only 3% at a 95% confidence level.

*** Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Volume 7, Issue 2
Social implications of children’s smartphone addiction: The role of support networks and social engagement

Jennifer Ihm

**** The Anxious Generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness
Johnathan Haidt, 2024
Penguin Press, NY, NY

bottom of page